Explore landmark anti-corruption rulings and asset recovery curated by the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC).
The Compendium of Cases on Asset Recovery is a meticulously curated digital repository featuring landmark judicial decisions in the fields of anti-corruption, recovery of unexplained assets, civil forfeiture, and constitutional law. This resource consolidates and presents authoritative case law that shapes and informs Kenya’s legal framework on asset recovery and integrity governance.
Developed by the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC), the Compendium serves as a strategic initiative to enhance public awareness, advance legal scholarship, and support institutional accountability. By offering direct access to precedent-setting judgments and evolving jurisprudence, the platform fosters a deeper understanding of the legal mechanisms available in combating corruption and illicit wealth.
Designed for legal practitioners, policymakers, academics, students, and the general public, this digital archive provides categorized, searchable access to both national and comparative international cases, enabling users to explore legal trends, interpretive developments, and practical applications in the fight against corruption and the recovery of public assets.
Temporary court decisions that address urgent matters pending the final determination of a case.
Cases challenging laws, actions, or omissions for alleged violation of constitutional rights or principles.
Legal proceedings involving property suspected to be acquired through illicit means without justifiable income sources.
Cases focused on identifying and recovering assets obtained from criminal activities under relevant statutes.
Disputes involving acquisition, ownership, and recovery of land suspected to be acquired unlawfully or through corruption.
Focuses on legal approaches to identifying, restraining, and confiscating property acquired through criminal activity, with emphasis on financial crime frameworks and international best practices.
Explores how courts interpret constitutional safeguards, issue warrants, and exercise discretion in civil forfeiture proceedings—balancing enforcement with rights protection.
